DONATE

Will Our Presidential Candidates Demand A Stop To “Stop-Loss”?

by Bobby Muller on Jul 23, 2008

When men and women in our country join the military, we enter into a sacred contract with them that obliges us honor their willingness to serve and sacrifice – end of story.

One of the most egregious violations of this mutual trust is something called “stop loss” – a very disturbing practice by which our men and women in uniform are forced to continue to serve in the military, after they had expected that they could leave.Let’s say you joined the military and agreed to three years of active-duty service. With “stop loss” you could get held for six months, twelve months, even as long as twenty-one months past the time of your contract. Now, think about that a minute – can you imagine any other contract that you would sign for thirty-six months where someone would just say, sorry, we’re adding on another year and a half to the deal? Of course not.

And yet, as we have written about before, this has happened to more than 70,000 soldiers have been stop lossed since 2002.

Why is this necessary?

Because this Bush Administration has stretched our military to the breaking point. Whether it’s our over-reliance on the National Guard, or breaking our contract with tens of thousands of men and women in uniform, the question is not whether we can continue the war forever in Iraq, but how in good conscience we can continue to treat our fellow countrymen and women so abusively?

Ours is a volunteer Army.

Don’t we owe them the basic right of respecting that contract? I think so.

Fortunately, Senator John McCain has called “stop loss” a “backdoor draft” that happens because the Army won’t own up to its true manpower shortages. (Unfortunately, retired Lt. Col. Ralph Peters, a McCain military advisor, recently called stop loss a “myth of the left”.)

In addition, Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, recently said: “I’d like to see stop-loss go away tomorrow…”

Senator Obama wants to end Stop-Loss orders as well.

There are active bills in Congress to not only end this process but compensate those who have been “stop-lossed.” For instance, Senator Frank Lautenberg recently introduced S. 3060, the Stop-Loss Compensation Act, which would require the Pentagon to pay troops who’ve been “stop lossed” an additional $1,500 for each month their service is extended. In the House, Congresswoman Betty Sutton is the original sponsor of H.R. 6205. We urge you to support their efforts.

Return to the Blog, Stop Loss Archive

VFA Blog

VFA Report Release: Pennsylvania’s National Guard, Under Great Strain

by VFA on Oct 23

Washington, DC - Oct. 23, 2008 - The citizen Soldiers of the Pennsylvania Army National Guard have borne a disproportionate share of the burden of our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Veterans for America (VFA) has found.

Between now and November…

MORE BLOG POSTS

GI Rights Hotline 1-877-447-4487

slca145.jpg